Divorce and Remarriage: A Permanence View by CCW Today
Elliff, Jim, Daryl Wingerd, Jim Chrisman, and Steve Burchett. Divorce & Remarriage – A Permanence View. Kansas City: Christian Communicators Worldwide, 2009. 160 pp. $15.99. Purchase at Amazon for $11.99 or less.
Special Note
I have had this book on my review shelf for a year and a half. I perused it when I first got it and then put it back on the shelf because I was frightened as to what it would mean for my ministry as a pastor in a local church. I have since reread it due to the fact that I have to write a position paper on the subject of divorce and remarriage.
Introduction
Four of the elders at Christ Fellowship of Kansas City found themselves needing to have a clear understanding of what the Bible taught on the thorny subject of divorce and remarriage. Divorce & Remarriage – A Permanence View is the final product of that study.
Summary
Divided into two parts, Wingerd and Co. set out to show what the Bible teaches independent of modern bias on the subject of divorce and remarriage. All four men originally came to the table with the most often held view that divorce was permissible though not commanded in cases of physical abuse and persistent adultery. They begin by looking at the simplified words; i.e., the clearest teachings found in Scripture by Christ on divorce and remarriage and then move to build on that foundation. Eighty-six pages later, their house is built and now they must explain how to apply the biblical teaching in the current church context.
In part two, the authors thoroughly answer most every question, leaving room for the reality that there are more questions yet to be asked, of holding to a permanence view of marriage.
There are a few appendices in the back that will help the reader to implement this view in his local congregation as well answering a few more questions not dealt with in the discussion throughout the book.
Review
The key phrase to the argument for a permanence view of marriage is “one-flesh union” extrapolated from Gen. 2:24. The key texts for this view are found in Mt. 19:6, Mark 10:9-12, and Luke 16:18. They show that many (myself included) have violated the fundamental hermeneutic principle of allowing the clear passages of Scripture to inform those that are less clear. Most of us argue that the “adultery” clause in Mt. 19:9, the only real place this exemption is allowed, to inform all of the other more strict teachings.
By the end of the first part of the book, I was impressed by their conviction as well as their continued humility in addressing this subject. The second part answers some 20+ questions as they seek to guide the reader to implement the clear teachings of Scripture. By the end of the book, you will find that your argument is not with the writers but with the Bible.
There is one phrasing that I did find difficult to discern. The phrase “Mt. 19/Mk 10 debate” was a bit confusing at times as the reference could have been to the debate between Christ and the Pharisees or the debate that exists today regarding this issue. Aside from that, I found the book and the arguments therein to be clear and cogent.
Recommendation
Let me first warn you that you will be held accountable for reading this book! Though I was pretty much aligned with the view espoused in this book, I had not really thought through the repercussions through for my ministry. Do not be like me and shy away from it because you are “afraid of the implications.” Their approach is both refreshing (because of their humility and submission to the Word of God) and challenging (because of the implications to ministry and the views of the world). Sadly, many of us will allow common understandings, though not really found in Scripture, to dictate how we interpret key verses in this discussion. If you are a pastor, I recommend you read this book…I dare you if you hold to the view of permissive divorce in the case of adultery/abuse. Keep in mind that this was the view formerly held by the four authors.











Recent Comments